In October 2018, a Chinese aerospace institute announced plans to replace Chengdu's street lights with an orbital mirror satellite — 8× brighter than the real moon. The plan attracted global headlines, withering scrutiny from physicists, and has never been launched.
8×BRIGHTER THAN THE REAL MOON
500kmPLANNED ORBITAL ALTITUDE
$174MCLAIMED ANNUAL ELECTRICITY SAVINGS
10–80kmPLANNED ILLUMINATION DIAMETER
2020ORIGINAL LAUNCH TARGET — MISSED
ZEROSATELLITES ACTUALLY LAUNCHED
THE CONCEPT
The Announcement
On 10 October 2018, Wu Chunfeng — chairman of the Chengdu Aerospace Science and Technology Microelectronics System Research Institute and head of the Tianfu New Area Science Society — announced the plan at a national innovation and entrepreneurship conference in Chengdu. He stated that China planned to launch an "illumination satellite" from the Xichang Satellite Launch Centre by 2020, with three more to follow in 2022 if the first succeeded.
The satellite would carry a large reflective coating to redirect sunlight toward Chengdu at night, producing a "dusk-like glow" Wu described as 8× brighter than the real moon but equivalent to roughly one-fifth the brightness of street lighting. The beam could illuminate an area 10 to 80km in diameter, with precision control down to a few dozen metres. If the 50 sq km around central Chengdu were illuminated, Wu estimated the city would save 1.2 billion yuan ($174 million) annually in electricity costs. Together, three moons could rotate to cover 3,600–6,400 sq km continuously for 24 hours.
The concept, Wu noted, was directly inspired by a French artist who had imagined hanging a necklace of mirrors above the Earth to reflect sunlight through the streets of Paris year-round. It was also — though Wu framed it as novel — a direct continuation of the Znamya concept Russia had attempted in 1993 and 1999.
WU CHUNFENG · CHINA DAILY · OCT 2018
"The first moon will be mostly experimental, but the three moons in 2022 will be the real deal with great civic and commercial potential."
THE PHYSICS PROBLEMS
Why Experts Were Sceptical
The announcement was met with immediate and pointed criticism from aerospace engineers. Ryan Russell, an associate professor of aerospace engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, identified the central flaw: a satellite at 500km cannot stay above one city. At that altitude, orbital velocity is approximately 7.6 km/s. The satellite would pass overhead and disappear in minutes — exactly the same problem that made Znamya-2's beam a one-second flash rather than a sustained light source.
To actually hover above Chengdu, the satellite would need to be in geostationary orbit at 35,786km altitude — nearly 72 times higher than proposed. But at that distance, a reflective satellite can produce no meaningful illumination at the surface. The physics of reflection over that distance, given the Sun's angular size, would spread the beam across an area so vast as to be invisible against the sky background. As Russell told Discover magazine: "It's a very complicated solution that affects everyone to a simple problem that affects a few. It's light pollution on steroids."
THE FUNDAMENTAL CONTRADICTION
Wu's proposal claimed a satellite at 500km could illuminate a specific city. But at 500km, no satellite can be geostationary — it circles Earth in roughly 95 minutes. To provide steady light over one city requires geostationary orbit at 36,000km. At that range, no mirror of practical size can deliver meaningful brightness. The proposal as stated violated basic orbital mechanics. No technical detail was ever published that resolved this contradiction, and no response from Wu to the specific criticism was recorded.
WHAT HAPPENED NEXT
The Quiet Disappearance
After the initial burst of international coverage in October 2018, the project went dark. No launch occurred in 2020. No technical specifications were ever published. No hardware was publicly displayed. No follow-up announcement came in 2022. The Chengdu artificial moon joined a long list of aspirational space proposals that generated headlines and then quietly dissolved without ever becoming hardware.
Whether the project was formally cancelled, indefinitely delayed, or simply abandoned is unknown — no official statement was ever made. Wu Chunfeng's institution, the Tianfu New Area Science Society, has made no further public statements about the programme. The Chinese national space agency (CNSA) was never publicly confirmed as a supporter, and no government funding was announced. The proposal may have been primarily a private initiative that never secured the institutional backing required to progress beyond the announcement stage.
DID THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT IT?
This is unclear. Wu Chunfeng's announcement came through state media (People's Daily, China Daily), which gave it legitimacy in Western coverage. But these outlets reported his claims rather than government policy. The announcement carried no CNSA endorsement, no official budget allocation, and no government spokesman confirmation. The Harbin Institute of Technology and China Aerospace Science and Industry Corp were named as involved, but no technical documentation was produced. The project may have been a proposal seeking investment rather than an active programme with committed government backing.
ALL SPACE MIRROR ATTEMPTS — COMPLETE RECORD
1993
ZNAMYA-2 · RUSSIA
✓ LAUNCHED · SUCCESS
20m Mylar. Lit Europe briefly. 1× full moon. Deorbited same day.
1999
ZNAMYA-2.5 · RUSSIA
✗ LAUNCHED · FAILED
25m Mylar. Snagged on Mir antenna. Torn. Deorbited same day. Programme cancelled.
2018
CHENGDU MOON · CHINA
ANNOUNCED · NEVER LAUNCHED
No specs published. 2020 deadline missed. No further updates. Quietly shelved.
2026
EÄRENDIL-1 · USA
FCC PENDING · MID-2026 TARGET
18×18m JPL origami fold. Independent satellite. First mirror since 1999.
?
ZNAMYA-3 · RUSSIA
PLANNED · NEVER BUILT
60–70m mirror. Cancelled after Znamya-2.5 failure. Never reached hardware stage.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Did China's artificial moon ever launch?+
No. The 2020 target was missed with no announcement. The 2022 follow-on constellation was never mentioned again. As of 2026, no illumination satellite matching the Chengdu proposal has been launched by any Chinese entity. The project appears to have been quietly abandoned, though no official cancellation was announced.
Why couldn't the satellite hover over Chengdu?+
At 500km altitude — the proposed orbit — a satellite travels at approximately 7.6 km/s and completes an orbit in about 95 minutes. It physically cannot stay above one location. To appear fixed in the sky above a city requires geostationary orbit at 35,786km altitude. But at that range, no practical mirror can produce meaningful brightness on the surface. Wu's proposal as stated was physically contradictory — it required a low enough orbit to be bright enough, but that same low orbit means it can never be stationary above one city.
Was this a serious government project?+
Almost certainly not at the national level. The announcement came from a private institute chairman at an entrepreneurship conference, was carried by state media, and attracted no confirmed CNSA funding or endorsement. No hardware photographs, technical drawings, or specifications were ever published. The Chinese government's actual space priorities in 2018–2022 were focused on lunar exploration (Chang'e programme), the Tiangong space station, and Beidou navigation satellites — none of which were connected to illumination satellites.
How does Chengdu compare to Znamya and Eärendil-1?+
Znamya-2 actually launched and briefly worked. Eärendil-1 has a confirmed FCC application, named investors, military contracts, and a published technical design. Chengdu had none of these — no launch vehicle contract, no investor, no FCC-equivalent filing, no hardware photographs. It is best understood as a conceptual announcement that attracted international media coverage far beyond its actual development status.
What was the inspiration for the Chengdu proposal?+
Wu specifically cited a French artist who had imagined a necklace of mirrors above Earth reflecting sunlight through Paris's streets year-round. This appears to reference a concept by French artist and artist-engineer Yves Klein, who in the late 1950s described "architecture of air" concepts including illuminated orbital structures. The practical engineering precedent was Russia's Znamya programme, which Wu was aware of, though the Chinese proposal did not acknowledge learning from Znamya's failure modes.